ITERVO
Evidence boundary
IMPACT METHODOLOGY • NO UNSUPPORTED CLAIMS

Measure the material first. Estimate environmental benefit second.

This page explains ITERVO's intended impact accounting boundary. It deliberately does not present internal development records as field traction. Real pilot results will be published only when the underlying weight, custody, downstream destination and supporting evidence are genuinely available.

1. Measured material

Report actual material weight by category only when a real weighing event is supported by an operational record or acceptable evidence.

2. Downstream destination

Collection is not automatically recycling. A recycler/processor receipt, destination confirmation or equivalent evidence is required before claiming a downstream circular outcome.

3. Mass balance

Keep collected, sent, received, rejected and unaccounted quantities separate. Do not silently treat losses or unverified quantities as processed material.

4. CO₂e estimates

Any CO₂e value is an estimate, never a carbon credit or regulatory certificate. The factor source, geography, version, material mapping, baseline and uncertainty must be disclosed.

5. No double counting

Each physical batch or verified transaction must have a unique reference so the same material cannot be counted twice across collection, processing and reporting views.

6. Evidence states

Use explicit labels: VERIFIED ACTUAL, PILOT TARGET, DEMO/SYNTHETIC, ESTIMATED, or NEEDS VERIFICATION.

Evidence rule: existing internal development/test records are not used as ITERVO pilot traction unless the founder supplies genuine supporting evidence and confirms they represent real-world activity.

Core reporting formulas

Verified recovery rate = weight with verified downstream outcome ÷ total genuinely collected weight × 100
Rejection rate = downstream rejected weight ÷ total genuinely collected weight × 100
Evidence completeness = records with required evidence ÷ completed pilot records × 100

A CO₂e estimate is calculated only after an approved material-specific methodology is selected. The current product contains reference-model capability, and field claims remain blocked until genuine pilot evidence is available.

Circular Impact overviewBack to evaluator path